Sections noted in red font are updated
and posted during public comment period.
SECOND PUBLIC COMMENT & REVIEW
APRIL 15, 2022 – APRIL 30, 2022
Table of Contents
Section Page
Public Notice 2
Purpose 3
Consultation 5
Public Participation 12
Needs Assessment 20
HOME ARP Activities 38
Use of HOME ARP Funding 41
HOME ARP Production Goals 44
Preferences (none) 45
HOME ARP Guidelines 46
Amended 21/22 AP-38 Sections 48
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION AND SECOND REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS ON
THE CITY OF OAKLAND’S HOME ARP PLAN/FIRST SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE 2021/22 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
The Public is invited to review and comment on the City’s First Substantial Amendment to the 2021/22 Annual Action Plan for the HOME American Rescue Plan (HOME ARP) Plan.
Availability of the City of Oakland HOME ARP Plan
(Any modifications to posting dates will be noted at the link above.)
Equal Access
Per the City’s Equal Access Plan and Language Access Program, the Google Translate function is made available on the City’s website providing interpretation of webpage content in eleven languages. Please access the HOME ARP Plan at the weblink provide above.
Oaklanders in need of language access services are able to contact City representatives named on the Language Access Services Contacts list at https://www.oaklandca.gov/services/find-language-access-services
Submission of Written Comments
Public comments or requests for additional information on the HOME-ARP must be submitted by April 30, 2022 to the attention of Greg Garrett at cdbg@oaklandca.gov with Subject: “Public Comments”. Due to COVID impacts our office is receiving public comments via email only.
To view the public hearing for this item, held Tuesday, December 21, 2021, please go to: https://oakland.granicus.com/player/clip/4646?view_id=2&redirect=true .
The purpose of this First Substantial Amendment to the 2021/22 Annual Action Plan is to
1. ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (“HOME”) GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF ELEVEN MILLION THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FORTY-ONE DOLLARS ($11,325,941) AWARDED TO THE CITY OF OAKLAND BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT UNDER THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN (“ARP”) ACT TO PROVIDE HOUSING, RENTAL ASSISTANCE, SHELTER AND OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES TO PERSONS WHO ARE HOMELESS OR AT RISK OF HOMELESSNESS, AND OTHER VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT A HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN AS PART OF THE CITY’S FIRST SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO ITS FISCAL YEAR (“FY”) 2021-22 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN; AND
3. AUTHORIZING THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO AWARD HOME PROGRAM AGREEMENTS FOR ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A, ATTACHED HERETO, AND THE CITY’S HOME-ARP ALLOCATION PLAN SUBMITTED AS PART OF ITS AMENDED FY 2021-22 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE COMPETITIVE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS, WITHOUT RETURNING TO COUNCIL.
The First Substantial Amendment to the 2021/22 AAP :
- Adds the City of Oakland HOME-American Recovery Plan (ARP) to the appendices of the 2021/22 AAP. For the purpose of public review, the HOME ARP Plan is provided on pages 3 - 27 of the online document for public review.
- Modifies Section AP-15 of the AAP to add HOME-ARP funds to the funding resource chart; and
- Modifies Section AP-38 to include Project Summary Information for the HOME-ARP activities.
- Adds required SF-424, SF-424B and SF 424D forms and other certifications for the HOME ARP grant.
-
All other portions of the 2021/22 Annual Action Plan posted at the following link remain unchanged: https://cao-94612.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/DRAFT2021-2220ANNUAL20ACTION20PLAN20DOCUMENT20-20205201720202120w20cove20and20TOC.pdf_dc-update.docx.pdf
First Substantial Amendment to the 2021/22 Annual Action Plan
for the
City of Oakland HOME-ARP Allocation Plan
Guidance
- To receive its HOME-ARP allocation, a PJ must:
- Engage in consultation with at least the required organizations;
- Provide for public participation including a 15-day public comment period and one public hearing, at a minimum; and,
- Develop a plan that meets the requirements in the HOME-ARP Notice.
- To submit: a PJ must upload a Microsoft Word or PDF version of the plan in IDIS as an attachment next to the “HOME-ARP allocation plan” option on either the AD-26 screen (for PJs whose FY 2021 annual action plan is a Year 2-5 annual action plan) or the AD-25 screen (for PJs whose FY 2021 annual action plan is a Year 1 annual action plan that is part of the 2021 consolidated plan).
- PJs must also submit an SF-424, SF-424B, and SF-424D, and the following certifications as an attachment on either the AD-26 or AD-25 screen, as applicable:
- Affirmatively Further Fair Housing;
- Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act and Anti-displacement and Relocation Assistance Plan;
- Anti-Lobbying;
- Authority of Jurisdiction;
- Section 3; and,
- HOME-ARP specific certification.
Participating Jurisdiction: City of Oakland, CA
Date: April 15, 2022 (Second Submission)
Consultation
Before developing its plan, a PJ must consult with the CoC(s) serving the jurisdiction’s geographic area, homeless and domestic violence service providers, veterans’ groups, public housing agencies (PHAs), public agencies that address the needs of the qualifying populations, and public or private organizations that address fair housing, civil rights, and the needs of persons with disabilities, at a minimum. State PJs are not required to consult with every PHA or CoC within the state’s boundaries; however, local PJs must consult with all PHAs (including statewide or regional PHAs) and CoCs serving the jurisdiction.
Summarize the consultation process:
The City of Oakland regularly consults with community stakeholders such as nonprofit agencies, social services providers, local Continuum of Care (CoC), developers, homeless providers, local public housing agency, and City of Oakland departments regarding the availability of funds to benefit low- and moderate-income residents of Oakland in need of affordable housing; homeless housing or services, homeless prevention, and housing and services for persons with human immunodeficiency virus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS); promoting community development needs for the homeless and low- to moderate-income residents and neighborhoods Oakland, for the Protection, Preservation and Production of affordable housing.
In the development of the City of Oakland’s Five Year Consolidated Plan for fiscal years (fy) 2020/21 – 2024/25, the 2021/22 Annual Action Plan (AAP), and the First Substantial Amendment to the 2021/22 AAP for the 2021/22 HOME Investment Partnerships American Rescue Plan (HOME ARP) Application, the City of Oakland consulted with City departments, local nonprofit agencies, Oakland Housing Authority, EveryOne Home (EOH) Continuum of Care for Alameda County, and other stakeholders in consideration of short-range and long range perspectives on affordable housing, homeless solutions, homeless prevention, HIV/AIDS housing and services and other community development activities impacting the most vulnerable populations, including HOME ARP Qualifying Populations.
Consultation leading up to the First Substantial Amendment to the City of Oakland 2021/22 AAP to add the HOME ARP Plan included scheduled meetings, phone/email conversations, developer meetings, town-hall type meetings with the public regarding Plan documents and participation regional planning efforts for fair housing activities, homeless solutions, and HIV/AIDS housing and other activities benefitting HOME ARP Qualifying Populations that are:
- Homeless;
- At Risk of Homelessness;
- Fleeing, or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault; stalking, or human trafficking;
- Part of other populations where providing supportive services or assistance would prevent a family’s homeless or serve those with greatest risk of instability; and/or
- Veterans and families that include a veteran family member that meets the criteria of one of four (1-4 ) above
See Table 1 below for further detail.
List the organizations consulted, and summarize the feedback received from these entities.
Table 1
Agency/Org Consulted |
Type of Agency/Org |
Method of Consultation |
Feedback Themes |
East Bay Housing Organization (EBHO) |
EBHO- member-driven organization made up of 500 local organizations and community leaders working to preserve, protect, and create affordable housing opportunities for all, particularly low-income communities in the East Bay by educating, advocating, organizing, and building coalitions. This Organization seeks to serve all qualifying populations with the value that “housing is a human right” that should be free of discriminatory, unfair and racist policies. This collaboration brings together organizations, community leaders, Bay Area city government, housing advocates and practioneers serving the five qualifying populations. |
August 2021 public presentation at member meeting
- solicit feedback on the City’s funding strategies, including use of HOME-ARP funds
- Use HOME-ARP for permanently affordable housing including Homekey projects
- Ensure New Construction NOFA is funded through HOME-ARP or other sources
- General support for City's funding strategies for all qualifying populations.
- Need for affordable housing for all, as a human right.
|
|
Economic & Workforce Development, City Planning & Building, Human Services |
City Department
Mission to increase investment in Oakland in a way that contributes to the growth of the City’s economy, fosters sustainability and expand job opportunities for all
residents and enhances the City’s sense of place and quality of life. Through EWD real estate development and economic development strategies EWD serves all qualifying populations. Though real estate development deals attracting developers to build or include affordable housing units, EWD primarily serves low-income at risk of homeless. |
Bi-weekly meetings from May 2021 to present
- Regular and ongoing strategic collaboration
- Funding planning and coordination
- Identify funding opportunities across departments to prioritize City-funded affordable housing projects, including HOME ARP, Homekey & other sources
- Identify administrative streamlining opportunities for affordable housing
- Discussed housing needs for all economic levels including low income (Extremely low - to moderate-income) and special needs households (this includes all five qualifying populations)
|
|
Oakland Department of Human Services Department (HSD) |
Local Government
City Department
Community Housing Services division of HSD primarily serves homeless, at risk of homeless, veteran and other qualifying populations to prevent a family’s homelessness or serve those with greatest risk of instability such persons with AIDS and their families. |
Regular meetings (at least monthly)
- Housing and Homeless Service Coordination.
Twice per year for Annual Action Plan Coordination.
- Input on programs, planned activities and strategies, Anti-Poverty input, Special Needs activities
- Funding should be prioritized for homeless and homeless prevention activities.
|
- Activities should be coordinated across programs including Continuum of Care, Supportive Housing Program; HOPWA, HOME, HOME ARP, CDBG, CDBG-CV, HOPWA-CV, ESG, and ESG-CV.
- Updates to Permanant Access To Housing (PATH) Framework , drivers of homelessness and documented interventions needed for deeply affordable (35%) & permanent supportive housing (15%), rapid rehousing (30%) and prevention (20%)
- $123M/year and $220M one-time capital needed to support interventions and strategies of the PATH Framework.
|
All-City Workgroup (Alameda County HCD +Local Jurisdictions) |
Local Government:
Housing
Services - Housing
Services-homeless
Primary qualifying populations served are homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless. |
Bi-weekly meetings |
- Implement best practices for housing and homeless housing interventions
- Coordinate Funding for Countywide and neighboring city strategies for use of HOME-ARP funds towards capital
- Discussion around potential operating subsidy for Homekey and New Construction affordable housing projects. New Construction Affordable Housing NOFA included HOME ARP, serving all five populations
|
East Bay Community Law Center |
Fair Housing and Fair Chance to Housing
(Beneficiaries of both programs fall under the fourth qualifying population “Other populations where providing supportive services or assistance would prevent a family’s homeless or serve those with greatest risk of instability”) |
Regular meetings
- Progress updates on the Fair Chance To Housing Ordinance Program benefitting community members returning from the criminal justice system
- Fair Housing activities
- Demand for pilot Fair Chance Access To Housing Ordinance program is currently not high as expected.
- Continued operation of the Fair Chance Ordinance Program will require greater outreach efforts to increase impact of program.
- Opportunity for community education for both Fair Chance and Fair Housing.
- Fair housing and Fair Chance Ordinance supports to homeless prevention for all low- to moderate-income households (all qualifying populations) and those formerly incarcerated
|
|
Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) |
Local government; Rental Assistance Providers; Outreach Agencies; and housing related legal services.
Assist qualifying populations at risk of instability or at risk of homelessness due to lack of resources to pay outstanding rent due. |
Weekly ERAP Partner meetings
- COVID Related Emergency Rental Assistance, housing stability and housing related legal services.
- COVID related Rental Assistance needs of the community by race, ethnicity, income level and zip code.
- Greatest need for housing stability and rental assistance for those who are Black and LatinX
- Target Population of Oakland’s ERAP program, Residents with 30% AMI or below, most vulnerable to homeless due to income and prior episodes of homelessness, most in need of housing stability services, HOME ARP qualifying population #4.
|
|
Alameda County Health Services |
Services-Persons with Disabilities
Services-Persons with HIV/AIDS
Services-homeless
Services-Health
Health Agency
Primarily serves 2 qualifying populations: homeless and at risk of homelessness. |
Monthly Scheduled Meetings
- Coordination among local and Alameda County homeless service strategies
- Input to local and Alameda County homeless Services Strategies (EveryOne Home and Oakland Permanent Access To Housing (PATH) Strategies
- HIV/AIDS, Behavioral Health and Mental Health Goals connected to HIV/AIDS and Homeless Housing Services.
- Special Needs populations
- Housing and support needs of these populations at risk of homelessness or experiencing homelessness.
|
|
EveryOne Home |
Alameda County Continuum of Care (CoC)
County-wide commitment to ending homelessness; funding to quickly rehouse homeless people; and helping people access mainstream services. Supports:
1 A community that address homelessness,
2. HUD funding for homeless housing & services,
3. System of Service & housing interventions for short and long term for people experiencing homelessness.
Provides coordinated entry in the operation of the CoC all of which serves all qualifying populations through support of supportive housing, homeless, HIV/AIDS and rapid rehousing programs and activities. |
Scheduled Regional meetings (Alameda County HCD, City of Berkeley and City of Oakland)
- Discuss regional issues affecting all three entitlement jurisdictions
- Coordinate HOPWA and Continuum of Care consultations.
- Point In Time Homeless Count Coordination
- Provided Updates to EveryOne Home Plan: A Strategic update to the EOH Plan to end homelessness and establish 5-year plans based on data to benefit needs assessed for populations that are homeless, chronically homeless, homeless veterans, homeless with serious mental issues, living with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence & human trafficking, and populations to provide services that prevent homelessness.
- Created annual HOPWA Goals and Objectives for Alameda County.
- Provided PIT homeless count (2019) that informs a portion of the needs assessment of the HOME ARP Plan
- Conducted the 2022 PIT Homeless Count.
|
|
Housing & Community Development (HCD) Plan Stakeholders* |
Foundations, Research, Non-Profit Providers, City Council, City Departments, Office of the Mayor, Race & Equity, California Housing Partnership, Fair Housing. |
Small Group Meeting, Interviews, and One on Ones
- Provide data and analysis Oakland Housing needs.
- Set departmental priorities for the HCD Strategic Plan
- Review HCD Strategic Plan
- Discussions provided data and analysis about Oakland and its residents for the City of Oakland 2021-2023 HCD Action Plan Needs Analysis
- Prioritize 3 Ps in Department Strategic Plan
- Protection
- Preservation
- Production
|
Data Driven Needs Analysis & Plan with a racial equity lens to address historic racial inequity in housing, create housing for extremely low income residents, target COVID relief responses, prevent displacement of Oakland residents, end family homelessness in Oakland, and create moderate-income & home ownership opportunities.
Identifies implementation and funding plans (including funding gaps & the use of HOME ARP funds and 9 other fund sources for affordable housing needs over next 2 years) shifting focus to invest 50% of resources into acquisition/conversion and preservation opportunities and 50% into new construction as funding allows.
Additional subsidy needed $307,032,000 to produce units need to create housing security for all Oakland residents.
*See additional stakeholder information below. |
Alameda County
Entitlement Jurisdictions |
Regional Government Organizations
Establishes fair housing goals, metrics and milestones for homeless, displaced or at risk, victims of domestic violence, and persons with HIV/AIDS benefitting the 5 qualifying populations |
Regularly Scheduled Regional Meetings of Jurisdictions and Community Meetings prior to the Oakland 2020/21 – 2024/25 Five Year Consolidated Plan
- Opportunities to increase fair housing choices across the County
- Analyze findings of County wide Fair Housing Assessment
- Formed a countywide effort to increase fair housing choices for residents across the county.
- Completed an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice across the region
- Importance of coordinated countywide effort to increase fair housing choices for residents across the county.
- Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice across the region.
- Summary of findings and needs assessment support Oakland HOME ARP Plan
|
|
Oakland Housing Authority OHA |
Public Housing Authority
OHA serves the Homeless & Victims of Domestic Violence qualifying population (qp) through its OPRI subsidy program; serves At Risk qp through Emergency housing vouchers.
Serves Veterans through its Veterans Affairs Support Housing Program and all programs for families at risk of instability or in need of services to prevent homelessness. |
Annual Consultation of Plans (2x year) |
- Analysis and discussion of public housing concerns, needs and analysis
- Identified opportunities for ongoing coordination of public and affordable housing efforts
- Agreed upon the number of units to be developed or funded during the year.
- OHA Plans for Making Transitions Work (MTW) and Non-MTW public housing and housing services to veterans, disabled, homeless, special needs, and at risk populations, domestic violence victims (emergency housing vouchers).
|
Low- and Moderate-Income Residents |
Oakland Residents
Beneficiaries of services in Oakland benefitting the 5 qualifying populations |
Virtual Town-hall
Public Hearing
Public review and feedback
for the 2020/21 – 2024/25 Consolidated Plan and 2021/22 AAP and Substantial Amendment for HOME ARP Application |
- Public review and feedback for the 2020/21 – 2024/25 Consolidated Plan and 2021/22 AAP.
- Community support of the HOME ARP application and Annual Action Plan
- Plan shared with public service agencies, general public, residents in low-and moderate-income Areas, and stakeholders.
|
Department of Housing & Community Development Stakeholders (including CBOs, City Council members, City Departments, Housing Authority, Race & Equity team, etc.) (See Table 2 Below) |
Housing Stakeholder Body
Stakeholders listed in Table 2 serve the five qualifying populations. |
One-on-One Meetings
Small Group Meetings
Interviews |
- Creation of the City’s Housing & Community Development Department 2021 - 2023 Strategic Action Plan.
- Adopted “Three P” (3P) approach to housing, generated by Committee to House The Bay Area (CASA) strategic framework. Three Ps: Protection, Preservation and Production
- Produced a Plan informed by data and stakeholder input
- Centers Race & Equity in “how” the City implements housing 3P activities.
See “Housing & Community Development (HCD) Plan Stakeholders” above. |
Table: 2021-2023 City of Oakland HCD Action Plan - Stakeholder Consultation
Public Participation
The City of Oakland HCD conducts ongoing community engagement and stakeholder outreach on and consistent basis to help guide its strategic priorities, coordinate programs, and ensure its program activities reflect the needs of the most vulnerable populations in Oakland. Input from stakeholders listed in Tables 1 and 2 were incorporated into the City of Oakland Fiscal Year (FY ) 2021/22 Annual Action Plan and the HOME ARP Plan and Application submitted as the First Substantial Amendment to the City of Oakland FY 2021/22 AAP.
The City of Oakland has been strategic and intentional in coordinating internally through interdepartmental work and planning as it relates to development of housing needs for HOME ARP qualifying populations listed above through coordination of funding, administration and resources.
The major take-aways from these meetings is the need to support and prioritize the most vulnerable populations of Oakland as it relates to housing, providing housing solutions for households who meet the qualifying populations, including those at risk of becoming homeless, particularly those currently housed with incomes of 80% Area Median Income (AMI) and below with high rent burdens.
Further discussions and consultation occurred between Oakland and Oakland HCD Strategic Plan Stakeholders, providing an updated strategic framework and targeted actions to meet the housing challenges of Oakland for 2021 - 2023. While it is the function of City leadership to set the vision, the implementation of these actions employed the full-throttle support of Oakland’s many diverse stakeholders to rise to the challenge of making quality opportunities available to all its residents and to address systematic housing inequity.
In the development of the HCD Strategic Plan, a “Three P” approach to housing: Protection, Preservation and Production, HCD leadership launched an extensive stakeholder listening effort leading with our values of diversity and innovation.
HCD Convened small group meetings (virtual & in person), interview, and one-on -ones with diverse stakeholders internal and external to the City. Additionally seeking to bring a data-driven and innovative approach to housing challenges, HCD partnered with Stanford University’s Changing Cities Research Lab, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and University of Pennsylvania’s Department of Regional and City Planning to provide data and analysis about Oakland, it’s residents and needs. See Table 2 below for a list of stakeholders.
Table 2 - HCD Strategic Plan Stakeholders
PJs must provide for and encourage citizen participation in the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan. Before submission of the plan, PJs must provide residents with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed HOME-ARP allocation plan of no less than 15 calendar days. The PJ must follow its adopted requirements for “reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment” for plan amendments in its current citizen participation plan. In addition, PJs must hold at least one public hearing during the development of the HOME-ARP allocation plan and prior to submission.
Describe the public participation process, including information about and the dates of the public comment period and public hearing(s) held during the development of the plan:
Description:
Four Step Public Participation
The City of Oakland provides for and encourages public participation in the development of the Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan), the Annual Action Plan (AAP), and Substantial Amendments to either the Con Plan or AAP (Substantial Amendment).
The City of Oakland’s process for public engagement is a rigorous four step process that includes outreach and engagement of housing stakeholders, program partners, internal and external agencies, and beneficiary populations, while also meeting the required public noticing process described below. The City of Oakland encourages participation of minorities, people who do not speak English, people with disabilities, Oaklanders with low- and moderate-incomes or living in low- and moderate-income areas through the following four tiers or steps of community engagement and public noticing:
1. Public Notice – Public Notices are placed in local newspaper publications considered most accessible to Oaklanders with low- and moderate-incomes and non-English Speaking residents.
2. Community Outreach – Staff maintains and updates a community list of stakeholders, non-profit agencies and community boards. Emails are forwarded to each contact listed to notify the availability of said Plan for public review and comment.
3. Public Comments & Community Feedback - Said Plans (AAP, Con Plan or Substantial Amendment ) are posted online for not less than the mandatory Federal public review period. Oaklanders are provided an email address, phone number and/or mailing address to forward public comments and feedback to regarding said Plan for the designated period.
4. Public Hearing - For City Council and public review, a Council Report and Legislation, summarizing said Plan is made available to the public through Oakland Legistar (https://oakland.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx) where meeting dates, agendas, reports, and related legislation are made available. Council Meetings for said Plans are held as a public hearing items. All public comments are recorded and made part of said plan. Summary of said Plan includes but not limited to:
- Summary of Planned Activities
- Project titles
- Project descriptions
- Fund source(s) and Estimate Amounts
- Description and estimate number of persons or areas to be served
- Performance period
- Any required certifications
Equal Access
City of Oakland, under the Equal Access To Services Ordinance (City Ordinance No. 12324) provides meaningful access of information and services related to City programs and activities to members of the public who have Limited English Proficiency (LEP). The City uses bilingual employees, interpreter, translators, telephone, internet, video interpretation and translated materials. Based on United States Census Bureau’s American Community Survey for LEP data the two highest non-English speaking groups meeting the 10,000-threshold are Spanish and Chinese.
Oaklanders in need of language access services are able to contact City representatives named on the Language Access Services Contacts list at https://www.oaklandca.gov/services/find-language-access-services.
Public Notices posted in newspapers are published in English, Spanish, and Chinese news publications; Spanish and Chinese being the top two non-English speaking populations in Oakland.
Said Plans are posted on the City’s website. Per the City’s Equal Access Plan and Language Access Program, the Google Translate function is made available on the City’s website providing interpretation of webpage content in eleven languages.
For City Council meetings and public hearings, Oakland residents needing special assistance to participate in Oakland City Council and Committee meetings are encouraged to contact the Office of the City Clerk and when possible, notify the City Clerk 5 days prior to the meeting so that reasonable arrangements can be made to ensure accessibility. This notice is included in each Agenda posted in Oakland Legistar, including City Clerk contacts as follows:
Office of the City Clerk - Agenda Management Unit Phone: (510) 238-6406
Fax: (510) 238-6699
Recorded Agenda: (510) 238-2386 Telecommunications Relay Service: 711
Citizen Participation For the HOME ARP Application:
- First Public Comment Period:
Start date – December 1, 2021
End date – December 31, 2021
- Second Public Comment Period:
Start date – April 15, 2022
End date – April 30, 2022
- The First Substantial Amendment to the City of Oakland 2021/22 AAP to add the HOME ARP Plan is posted on the City of Oakland’s website at https://cao-94612.s3.amazonaws...
Public hearing for the HOME APR Plan was held December 21, 2021, at the Oakland City Council meeting convening at 1pm via Zoom. – Virtual Public Hearing.
Public participation and viewing instructions of the December 21, 2021, public
Hearing were provided at https://www.oaklandca.gov/services/annual-action-plan-21-22 in eleven languages via Google Translate function as follows:
- Go to https://oakland.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx
- Select the “Agenda” icon for the December 21, 2021, City Council meeting
- Updated Zoom link, dial-in and KTOP access instructions are provided in the agenda for the December 21, 2021, Council Meeting/Public hearing.
- Additional instructions provided in the Agenda Packet for participation in the Council Meeting/Public Hearing as follows:
- Those in need of special assistance to participate in Oakland City Council and Committee meetings please contact the Office of the City Clerk. When possible, please notify the City Clerk 5 days prior to the meeting so we can make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. City Clerk Phone: 510.238.6406, Fax: 510.238.6699, Telecommunications Relay Service: 711
While special assistance to the public was made available, consistent with the City of Oakland’s Equal Access To Services Ordinance, there were no requests for special assistance (LEP or ADA) for this meeting.
Language access services: https://www.oaklandca.gov/services/find-language-access-services
Describe any efforts to broaden public participation:
A PJ (Participating Jurisdiction) must consider any comments or views of residents received in writing, or orally at a public hearing, when preparing the HOME-ARP allocation plan.
Public outreach related to the First Amendment to the City of Oakland’s FY 2021-2022 AAP for the HOME-ARP Plan has involved broad engagement with community-based agencies, affordable housing organizations, and Oakland residents through the City’s Citizen Participation process and Consultation process.
The HOME ARP Plan is made available for public review and comments for not less than a fifteen-day period prior to submitting the plan to HUD. Staff has made the HOME ARP Plan
available for more than fifteen days from December 6, 2021 – December 21, 2021.
Public notices regarding the HOME APR Plan have been posted in English, Spanish and Cantonese in the East Bay Times, El Mundo, The Post, and Sing Tao news publications serving the general Oakland population and those residents living in low- and moderate-income areas of Oakland.
Public notice of the HOME ARP Plan is also forwarded via email blasts to Oakland residents, non-profits, shareholders, EOH participants, Oakland Community Development District Boards, City departments, including entities consulted with prior to the submission of the HOME ARP Plan.
An opportunity for public participation convened at the Public Hearing portion of the Oakland City Council held on December 21, 2021. City Council will provide attendees and interested parties the opportunity to respond to the posted First Substantial Amendment to the City of Oakland 2021/22 AAP to add the HOME ARP Plan and provide feedback in an open public forum. Said Public Hearing was recorded and available online for future viewing. A Summary of all comments will be included in the final submission of the HOME ARP Plan prior to submitting to the U. S. Department of Housing & Urban Development.
Summarize the comments and recommendations received through the public participation process:
Through the public participation process, there were no comments during the public comment period. However, at the public hearing there were 5 public comments. As mentioned above, the main feedback themes in our outreach were:
- Homeless Housing Needs
- Special Needs Housing
- Housing Stability Services
- Affordable/Deeply Affordable Housing
- Housing Need of Extremely Low Income
- Homeless Prevention
- Rent Burden of those with 30% AMI and below
A range of comments we made by the public as listed below ranging from how HOME ARP uses should be decided, what race groups the program should be targeted to, to specific concerns regarding the expected response of the homeless population.
Serving low- and extremely low-income residents of Oakland was the common them of the majority of public comments during the public hearing and focusing on subsidies and practices that house low and extremely low income to get everyone housed.
More detailed information about each public comment is provided below:
- Speaker 1: Liked the ideas around Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) to housing low-income and the homeless. And also wants to make sure that the City is taking advantage of the flexibilities potentially offered through mixed housing serving Extremely low-income and Very low-income residents. Consider SB10 units as well. Invite wide range of choices. Focus on good subsidies and good practices to house low - income people. Let’s get everyone housed.
- Speaker 2: Expressed that it will be a challenge to provide permanent housing to the homeless. Per speaker #2, the homeless doesn’t trust the City, its housing and service partners. She further stated that the City says it will serve the most vulnerable through HOME ARP and alluded to the argument that the program does not focus on those most in need: Blacks and Hispanics. Speaker advised that the homeless need social services and mental services and that the City should talk more to the homeless to see what they need and want regarding housing.
- Speaker 3 suggested an Adhoc committee should be made of 3 Oakland City Council members to decide what funds are used to serve the homeless and for what purpose.
- Speaker 4: The City needs to be creative in to house the unhoused. Use “Mixed Income Housing” to mix everybody’s problems and come up with a solution. Homeless are traumatized by personal matters, mental issues and housed in a community space with a “tower” of homeless persons. Lastly, she expressed that she doesn’t see how ADUs will help the homeless. Most landlords are not going rent to the homeless.
- Speaker 5 (final speaker) Says this item should be scheduled on the same agenda as the “police spending” topics and use funds given to the police for public safety and instead consider “homelessness” as a public safety issue for which Police funds can be better used.
Summarize any comments or recommendations not accepted and state the reasons why:
If any, a summary of comments and recommendations not accepted will be included in the final HOME ARP after the December 21, 2021, Public Hearing.
All comments and recommendations are made part of this report. There are no recommendations from the public that were not accepted. All recommendations made during the public hearing and the initial public review and comment period during the month of December 2021.
All comments, feedback and recommendations provided during the second public review/comment period of April 15, 2022 – April 30, 2022, will be included as well.
Needs Assessment and Gaps Analysis
PJs must evaluate the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within its boundaries and assess the unmet needs of those populations. In addition, a PJ must identify any gaps within its current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system. A PJ should use current data, including point in time count, housing inventory count, or other data available through CoCs, and consultations with service providers to quantify the individuals and families in the qualifying populations and their need for additional housing, shelter, or services. The PJ may use the optional tables provided below and/or attach additional data tables to this template.
Homeless |
|
Current Inventory |
Homeless Population |
Gap Analysis |
|
Family |
Adults Only |
Vets |
Family HH (at least 1 child) |
Adult HH (w/o child) |
Vets |
Victims of DV |
Family |
Adults Only |
|
# of Beds |
# of Units |
# of Beds |
# of Units |
# of Beds |
# of Beds |
# of Units |
# of Beds |
# of Units |
Emergency Shelter |
188 |
52 |
672 |
17 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transitional Housing |
141 |
75 |
417 |
15 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent Supportive Housing |
203 |
84 |
1246 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Permanent Housing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheltered Homeless |
|
|
|
|
|
196 |
655 |
51 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
Unsheltered Homeless |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3197 |
310 |
205 |
|
|
|
|
Current Gap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
-1517 |
-1517 |
OPTIONAL Homeless Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table
Data Sources: 1. Point in Time Count (PIT) EveryOne Counts! 2019 Homeless Count & Survey-Alameda County, CA; 2. Alameda County EveryOne Home Housing Inventory Count (HIC); 3. Consultation with Oakland Human Services Department - Community Housing Services.
OPTIONAL Housing Needs Inventory and Gap Analysis Table
Non-Homeless |
|
Current Inventory |
Level of Need |
Gap Analysis |
|
# of Units |
# of Households |
# of Households |
Total Rental Units |
96,305 |
|
|
Rental Units Affordable to HH at 30% AMI (At-Risk of Homelessness) |
15,550 |
|
|
Rental Units Affordable to HH at 50% AMI (Other Populations) |
12,095 |
|
|
0%-30% AMI Renter HH w/ 1 or more severe housing problems
(At-Risk of Homelessness) |
|
23,170 |
|
30%-50% AMI Renter HH w/ 1 or more severe housing problems
(Other Populations) |
|
12,920 |
|
Current Gaps |
|
|
8,445 |
Data Sources: 1. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cp.html 2014-2018 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS)
Describe the size and demographic composition of qualifying populations within the PJ’s boundaries:
Information below provides a demographic composition of each qualifying population in Oakland.
1. HOMELESS
The Alameda County 2019 EveryOne Counts Homeless Point In Time Count and Survey figures for Oakland identified a homeless population of 4,071 individuals, an increase of 1,310 individuals (+47 percent) from 2017. The population of persons experiencing homelessness in Oakland represented over half (51 percent) of the total number of persons enumerated in Alameda County during the 2019 Point-in-Time Count. See Figure 3 of the Alameda County EveryOne Counts - 2019 Homeless Count Survey, below.
Seventy-nine percent (79%) of the homeless population is reported to be unsheltered. Over one-third (35%) of the population were residing in vehicles. An additional 32 percent were residing in tents or makeshift shelters and 10 percent were identified sleeping on the streets and in other outdoor locations. One percent (1 percent) was identified in non-residential buildings.
While the number of individuals sleeping on the streets and other outdoor locations decreased by 33 percent (206 individuals), the number of individuals sleeping in tents increased by 130 percent (747 individuals). The total number of persons residing in their vehicles increased by 131 percent (812 individuals), with the number of persons
residing in RVs increasing by 131 percent (399 individuals) and the number of persons residing in cars or vans increasing by 132 percent (413 individuals).
Individuals identifying as Black/African American were overrepresented in the population experiencing homelessness. An estimated 70 percent of persons experiencing homelessness in Oakland identified as Black/African American compared to 47 percent of the overall County’s population experiencing homelessness and 24 percent of the city’s general population. Alternatively, 17 percent identified as Hispanic, Latino or Latinx, and 2 percent of those counted identified as Asian.
The Oakland Equity Indicators report on housing and anti-displacement further supports this finding, reporting a homeless rate of 1,797 per 100,000 for Black/African Americans compared to 286.6 per 100,000 and 329.3 per 100,000 Latinx homeless rates resulting from displacement. This same report indicates that 58.4 percent of African American residents and 52.7 percent Latinx residents are rent burdened, meaning more than 30 percent of their annual income is spent on rent (1.67 times more than White households).
With Affordable Rental Housing ranked at the top (47 percent) of the Alameda County 2019 EveryOne Counts Homeless Point In Time Count and Survey, the top six recommended uses of new money include Affordable Rental Housing (47 percent), Permanent Help with Rent Subsidy (41 percent), Employment Training and Job Opportunities (30 percent), Short Term Financial Assistance (18 percent), Housing With Supportive Services (22 percent), and Substance Use and/or Mental Health Services (24 percent).
As noted in the City’s FY 2021-2022 AAP, 53 percent of Oakland residents are extremely low-income, very low-income, or low-income, with incomes ranging from 0-80 percent of Area Median Income (AMI). Of the 53 percent, 25 percent are extremely low-income (0-30 percent AMI), 15 percent are very low-income (31-50 percent AMI), and 13 percent are low-income (at 51-80 percent AMI).
2. AT RISK OF BEING HOMELESS
The PATH Framework encompasses seven goals with accompanying strategies: 1) prevent homelessness, 2) increase rapid returns to housing, 3) reduce the total number of people experiencing homeless, 4) create permanent housing opportunities, 5) stabilize and increase income, 6) deliver health care and proper hygiene to encampments, and 7) address racial disparities. The PATH Framework goals that have been integrated throughout both Housing & Community Development and Human Services Department ‘s work include homelessness prevention/anti- displacement, creation of deeply affordable permanent housing, and addressing racial disparities.
As reported in the 2014-2018 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS), thirty-one percent (31%) of Oakland Renters have a household income less than or equal to 30% HUD Area Median Family Income. Of the 31% with 30% HAMFI or lower, Oakland’s lowest income households are experiencing the highest rent burden. Over 80% of extremely low-income (ELI) households pay more than 30% of their income towards rent, with 46% paying over 50% of their income towards rent.
High rent burden on extremely low-income renters coupled along with sever housing problems is essentially a measure or proxy of a non-income household living in inhabitable conditions and considered at risk of becoming homeless.
Oakland has experienced numerous shifts in its residential pattern in the years since the Great Recession of 2008. With a current population of 440,981, Oakland’s population has grown by approximately 13% compared to the 2010 Oakland population count.
HCD partnered with the Changing Cities Research Lab at Stanford University and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco to understand the shifts in neighborhoods, impaction of displacement and overall picture of who and how City residents, especially Black and Brown community members are faring.
Oakland’s central housing needs center on lack of affordable housing, high incidence of housing cost burden, particularly among extremely- and very low-income renter populations, increasing degrees of homelessness and lack of housing and critical services for homeless and special needs at-risk populations, and increasing displacement and gentrification pressures that have occurred over the past decade.
3. FLEEING, OR ATTEMPTING TO FLEE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, DATING VIOLENCE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, STALKING OR HUMAN TRAFFICKING
Per the City of Oakland Department of Violence Prevention Strategic Plan, Domestic Violence is approached as “Gender Based Violence" or “Intimate Partner Violence”. (https://cao-94612.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/Attachment-A-DVP-Strategic-Spending-Plan-FY-22-24-for-Report-1.pdf ),
Gun and gender-based violence have been a decades long fight for the City of Oakland. Government agencies, non-profit service providers, and community members have worked
tirelessly to end gun violence and human trafficking in Oakland. And while the city has seen some progress, it has been widely uneven. Gun and intimate partner violence and sexual exploitation continue to plague black and brown communities at alarming rates.
Oakland continues to be a West Coast hub for sex trafficking, with Alameda County’s H.E.A.T (Human Exploitation and trafficking) Watch reporting that 63% of youth involved in “the life” are African American girls.
Once the global COVID-19 pandemic hit Oakland in March 2020, it added to significant vulnerabilities of communities already on the edge. School closures, the loss of jobs, and stay-at-home orders exposed and contributed to a rise in shootings, intimate partner violence and homicides. And increases in the use of the internet and people taking more risks to desperately make up for lost income has amplified the opportunity for human trafficking.
The toll of gun and gender-based violence has been felt mostly by Oakland’s black and brown communities. In 2020, 78% of shooting victims were African American and Latinx and overwhelmingly male. And for Oakland sexually exploited youth, 64% are African American and 15% LatinX respectively.
These high rates of violence have consistently been concentrated in neighborhoods within East, Central East, and West Oakland.
Per the 2019 Oakland PIT Homeless Count histories of domestic violence and partner abuse are prevalent among individuals experiencing homeless and can be a primary cause of homelessness. Of the 4,071 Oakland homeless population, seven percent (7%) are victims of domestic/partner violence or abuse.
Survivors often lack financial resources required for housing, as their employment history or dependable income may be limited.
Similar to the 2019 Oakland PIT Homeless Count , data adopted from Safe Housing Partnerships online report based on 1998 - 2004 studies[i] that suggests the intersection of safety barriers to housing issues. As a direct result of power and control dynamics related to their abuse, survivors often face unique barriers to access shelter and affordable housing such as:
- Poor credit and ruined rental histories
- Lack of steady employment from victims forced to miss work as result of domestic violence
- Housing Discrimination, most commonly from landlords evicting victim from housing due to repeated calls
- Loss of subsidized or other affordable housing caused by lease or voucher policy violations committed by the abuser.
4. OTHER POPULATIONS: FAMILIES REQUIRING SERVICES OR HOUSING
ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS & THOSE AT GREATEST RISK OF HOUSING
INSTABILITY
Other qualifying populations protection strategies to prevent displacement and to ensure that low-income renters and homeowners have the information, tools, and support needed to remain in their homes in accordance with local and state laws. These tools also include legal services and financial assistance. The objective of a proactive protection approach is two-fold: to blunt economic and market factors that create housing instability and to strengthen low-income residents’ standing as renters and homeowners to remain housed in Oakland, if they choose.
A cornerstone of protection strategies is the Rent Adjustment Program, which is about housing stability at its core. Those experiencing excessive rent increases can have a devastating effect not only on the individual but also on the entire community. They force thousands of Oakland residents to choose between spending over half their income on rent, foregoing other necessities, or moving far away from jobs and community ties.
For many, none of these choices are viable, hence homelessness becomes the only option. The COVID-19 crisis has not only exacerbated this problem but has also made it even clearer that there is a need for a strong protective framework. By implementing and enforcing the recently passed Tenant Protection, Just Cause, and Eviction Moratorium Ordinances, the Rent Adjustment Program is a key component of anti-displacement policy.
Anti-displacement and protection efforts must also directly address racial inequities in the housing market. According to the U.S. Census in 2000, Oakland’s Black population was 36%, and in 2020 it fell to 23%. The data suggests that rising rents and the disproportionate impact of the foreclosure crisis on black homeowners following the 2008 Recession has contributed to this precipitous demographic shift. While homelessness is the most visible outcome of this displacement, many of Oakland’s families had to relocate to more affordable locales within the region or had to leave the region and their communities altogether. Providing a space for these residents to return or stay in Oakland must be a core component of any anti-displacement strategy. In 2016, the Oakland City Council revised its Oakland resident/worker preferences and requirements in City affordable housing programs. This is an important policy objective to ensure Oakland residents can benefit from new affordable housing. As displacement of longtime residents remains an ongoing concern, some municipalities have sought to revise and better target these preferences.
- VETERANS AND FAMILIES THAT INCLUDE A VETERAN FAMILY MEMBER – THAT MEET THE CRITERIA FOR OND OF THE QUALIFYING POPULATIONS
Per the 2019 PIT Homeless Count, 9% of the 4,071 reported as homeless are veterans. Eighty-six percent (86%) of homeless veterans are unsheltered and fourteen percent (14%) residing in emergency shelters or transitional housing. Compared to Alameda County’s homeless veteran population, Oakland’s homeless population make up for fifty-two percent (52%) of Alameda County’s homeless veteran population.
Primary causes of homeless among veterans in Oakland are rent increases, mental health issues, incarceration and other unknown causes.
Causes of Homelessness Among Veterans in Oakland |
Percentage of Oakland Homeless Veteran Population (361) |
Rent Increase |
18% |
Mental Health Issues |
13% |
Incarceration |
10% |
Other |
10% |
Unknown |
10% |
The 2019 PIT Homeless count indicates that homeless veterans in Oakland are living with one or more health conditions at a higher rate than non-veterans. Homeless veterans are reported to have higher rates of living with psychiatric or emotional conditions, a physical disability, chronic health problems, and traumatic brain injury compared to the overall Oakland homeless population.
Health Conditions of Homelessness Veterans in Oakland |
Percentage of Oakland Homeless Veteran Population (361) |
Psychiatric or Emotional Conditions |
42% |
Physical Disability |
38% |
Chronic Health Problems |
38% |
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder |
34% |
Drug or Alcohol Use |
28% |
Traumatic Brain Injury |
15% |
AIDS/HIV Related |
3% |
Describe the unmet housing and service needs of qualifying populations, including but not limited to:
- Sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations.
- Those currently housed populations at risk of homelessness;
- Other families requiring services or housing assistance or to prevent homelessness; and,
- Those at greatest risk of housing instability or in unstable housing situations:
From the information gathered through stakeholder consultations, public comments, organizations consultation and data for the City’s HCD Strategic Action Plan which focuses on Protection, Preservation and Production of housing, the PATH Strategy for ending homelessness, Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) California mandate requiring Cities to plan for local housing needs; the 2019 PIT Homeless Count for Oakland which surveys and produces a point in time count of the homeless population, and other data mentioned throughout this HOME ARP Plan all commonly supports the need for increased deeply affordable housing, permanent supportive housing (including operations) to benefit the most vulnerable of Oakland’s populations, those including but not limited to: homeless , near-homeless, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, single women with children, victims of abuse, violence or trafficking and other populations and subpopulations that meet definition of one or more of the five qualifying populations under the HOME ARP Plan.
Sheltered and Unsheltered Homeless Populations
Per the Alameda County 2019 Point in Time (PIT) homeless count, over half (51%) of the homeless population of Alameda County (8,022) are individuals experiencing homeless in Oakland (4072). Of the 4,072 experiencing homelessness in Oakland; the highest number of homeless reported by City in the Alameda County, 3,210 are unsheltered and 861 are sheltered.
Many individuals experiencing homeless have significant barriers in retaining permanent housing. These barriers can range from housing affordability and availability to accessing the economic and social supports (e.g.), increased income, rental assistance and case management needed to access and retain housing.
As reported in the EveryOne Counts 2019 Homeless PIT Count, when asked How New Money Should Be Spent, homeless respondents replied:
- Affordable Rental Housing (47%)
- Permanent Help with Rent Subsidies (41%)
- Employment Training/Job Opportunities (30%)
- Substance Use/Mental Health Services (24%)
- Short term Financial Assistance (18%)
Per the Oakland PATH Strategy, primary interventions needed to end homelessness for many sheltered and unsheltered include deeply affordable housing, permanent affordable housing and rapid rehousing. Deeply affordable housing and permanent supportive housing contributing to 50% of the four inventions assessed as needed.
Currently Housed Populations At Risk of Homelessness
Under State law, every city and county in California must adopt a Housing Element or plan, as part of its General Plan. An updated Element allows a City to access critical local, state and federal funds.
The RHNA is a State rule that requires all California cities to plan enough regional housing to meet housing needs for all income levels. Per these Plans, Oakland must plan for 14,765 new housing units between 2015 and 2023. The Oakland Housing Cabinet released Oakland At Home recommending an ambitious set of strategies through the 17k/17k Plan to preserved 17,000 housing units and produce a total of 17,000 units for Oakland residents by 2023, including 4,760 affordable units.
As of 2021, Oakland must produce at least 2,084 affordable housing units to meet the 2015 - 2023 target of 4,760 total affordable housing units per the RHNA targets.
Applying historical affordability levels onto the projected production rates, the City falls short of RHNA goals across all categories of affordability. To meet the higher RHNA targets, the City must identify new capital and operating subsidies beyond $307million to produce the units need to create housing security for all Oakland residents.
Projected Production vs. RHNA Targets, Calendar Year 2016 - 2023
Reported in the 2019 Homeless PIT Count, when asked what might have helped them retain housing, most respondents to the EveryOne Counts 2019 Homeless County and Survey most often cited the followings as resources that would have prevented their homeless status as the time:
- Rental Assistance (35%)
- Benefits/Income (32%)
- Mental Health Services (22%)
- Alcohol/Drug Counseling (19%)
- Employment Assistance (16%)
Other families requiring services or housing assistance or to prevent homelessness;
This framework recognizes that providing someone with a bed in an emergency shelter or transitional housing program offers a critical stepping-stone toward housing stability but alone is insufficient. Preventing vulnerable residents from becoming homeless and expanding the supply of deeply affordable and supportive housing, especially for seniors and persons with disabilities, and/or with HIV/AIDs are necessary elements for solving homelessness.
The crisis that precedes someone becoming homeless varies significantly and ranges from a mental or physical health crisis, to job loss, to property loss due to inadequate estate planning. But what is common to all is that the longer one is homeless the worse one’s health becomes, the more likely family and friendship networks are frayed, and the harder it becomes to obtain, maintain, and sustain stable housing.
In order to successfully reduce, prevent and end Oakland’s trend of escalating homelessness, City leaders and community partners must have a shared understanding of the drivers of homelessness. The main drivers of homelessness in Oakland include:
• Structural racism
• Insufficient controls on the rental housing market that create vulnerability and housing
instability for tenants
• Insufficient housing units that are affordable to households with the lowest incomes,
including particularly those whose incomes are below 20 percent of Area Median Income
(AMI)
• Systemic barriers that often prevent residents who are returning home from incarceration
from living with family members and/or accessing both public and private rental housing
and employment opportunities
• Inadequate pay and benefits for many of the jobs that are available in the community,
and insufficient access to quality employment opportunities that pay wages that meet the cost of housing
To increase housing stability and prevent homelessness expansion of deeply affordable housng and permanent supportive housing opportunities must be put in places for at least 700 households.
Per the the 2019 PIT Homeless Count, 35% homeless could have been prevented with rental assistance for 35%, Income/benefits for 32%, mental health services for 22%, and alcohol drug counseling for 19%.
Per the 2020,21 – 2024/25 Oakland Consolidated Plan, individuals with developmental disabilities have very low incomes, most of the only receiving SSI benefits ($721/month in 2014) Finding apartment for 30% of their income in the area is extremely difficult. Individuals with physical disabilities require housing which is both affordable and adapted to their physical needs. There is a significant need for supportive services in addition to housing, such as assistance with daily life activities in-home assistance, and social services such as employment training, counseling, benefits advocacy and independent living skills. The Housing Consortium of the East Bay (a nonprofit organization that promotes affordable, accessible housing options for persons with developmental disabilities) found that there are 14,988 adults within the HOME Consortium area who have developmental disabilities . Type of HOPWA Assistance Estimates of Unmet Need Tenant based rental assistance 0 Short-term Rent, Mortgage, and Utility, 85 Facility Based Housing (Permanent, short-term or transitional)
Those at greatest risk of housing instability or in unstable housing situations:
It is well established through public participation, stakeholder consultations and the data sources and plans first referenced in this section of Oakland’s HOME ARP Plan that extremely low income (ELI) and moderate-income households face the greatest risk of displacement, particularly those residents in East Oakland and parts of West Oakland being particularly vulnerable. For the ELI to moderate-income Oakland residents at greatest risk of housing instability there is an unmet housing and service need for approximately 2,709 affordable housing units and necessary services to keep Oaklanders housed.
Identify and consider the current resources available to assist qualifying populations, including congregate and non-congregate shelter units, supportive services, TBRA, and affordable and permanent supportive rental housing:
The City of Oakland Permanent Access To Housing (PATH) Strategy and framework is implemented with the goal of making homelessness brief, rare and one-time. Currently PATH receives annual funding of approximately $40M per year to provide overnight shelter, transitional/supportive housing, housing and services for persons with HIV/AIDS, HIV/AIDS short term rental or mortgage utility assistance, Community Cabins, rapid rehousing services, homeless encampment services, and other activities benefitting over 2,619 sheltered and unsheltered residents of Oakland experiencing homelessness.
In response to COVID-19, City of Oakland homeless service agencies reduced bed capacity to create social distancing, to reduce the potential of exposure to the coronavirus for staff and its clients. Where possible shelter-in-place was encouraged. To offset the reduction of bed capacity, Oakland agencies were able to access 1,142 FEMA Non-Congregate shelter beds for adults without children.
CARES Act allocations under the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG-CV) are allocated to provide rapid rehousing, shelter services, homeless prevention and portable hygiene stations benefiting the homeless.
Other sources are allocated to provide services to those who are at imminent risk of homeless through one-time CARES Act allocations under Community Development Block Grant (CDBG-CV) providing housing stability, housing related legal services and development of housing for the homeless; one-time CARES Act allocations under the Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA-CV) to provide rent assistance to persons with HIV/AIDS transitioning from Roomkey units to permanent housing; and one time allocations under the U.S. Treasury Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) enabling current renters to stay housed providing rent relief for up to 18 months.
For Affordable Housing, current project sources available to the City Oakland is $73,937,323 for FY 2020/21 - FY 2022/23. Sources include Affordable Housing Impact Fee, Job Housing Impact Fee, Boomerang funds, HOME funds, HOME ARP funds, Excess Redevelopment Bond, Cal Home and Local Housing Trust. Strategies for these funds are Protection, Preservation and Production.
Under the Production Strategy, the City has invested nearly $110 million in City funding into affordable housing production since 2017, leveraging more than $730 million of additional investment. This means for every $1 of City funding, the City has leveraged nearly $7 of other sources – this is largely due to availability of A1 funding from Alameda County. However, this ratio should go down to about $1 for every $4 of other sources moving forward, as County A1 funding has been fully allocated.
Production strategies provide new affordable housing opportunities through new construction of housing, provision of financing for first-time homebuyers to acquire an affordable home, and the provision of rental and operating subsidies that create affordability for low-income residents over the long term. These actionable production strategies are critical in addressing homelessness, displacement, and rent burdens for low-income households, especially in historically disinvested neighborhoods.
Identify any gaps within the current shelter and housing inventory as well as the service delivery system:
Currently the City of Oakland has limited sources to fund affordable housing needs. The largest allocations in recent years have come from significant one-time allocations such as Redevelopment Bond and Measure KK funds. As of 2020, Oakland’s Department of Housing & Community Development (DHCD) awarded nearly all $100 million in Measure KK housing funds, resulting in a significant drop in available resources in 2021. Starting in 2022, projected allocations for affordable housing will drop approximately $12 million per year.
To increase production of affordable housing to meet a target of 4,760 units by 2024, the City needs to identify over $457 million in additional subsidy beyond existing projects to meet annual housing production targets. [ii]
In addition to development dollars, projects serving qualifying populations require operating resources.
1. Homeless
Per the Oakland Permanent Access To Housing (PATH) Plan, an additional 800 shelter or crisis response beds are needed within the next two years. In addition, funding to ensure ongoing funding for existing crisis response beds.
$16 million in one-time funding is needed, using sprung shelter model. $22,500 per bed is needed to operate emergency shelter or transitional housing for 800 beds.
To maintain existing beds and spaces that will soon become unfunded, $4 million/year is needed to support 245 emergency shelter beds; $5.1 million/year to support 232 beds community cabins; $2.3 million to support “Safe Parking” for homeless living in vehicles; and improvement of 200 existing shelter beds for $1.6 million.
2. At Risk of Homelessness
To implement prevention programs targeted to people most at risk of homelessness and to strengthen anti displacement efforts, Oakland (PATH) Plan estimates a need of not less than $2.5 million per year or 3,500 – 4,000 per household.
Based on service levels of the City’s Emergency Rental Assistance Program (ERAP) and other housing stability services provided to Oakland’s low- to moderate-income residents anywhere from 4,030 and 7,500 Oakland renters would need access to affordable housing and/or continue rental assistance.
3. Fleeing, or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual
assault; stalking, or human trafficking
Determining the gaps in service and delivery system for this population specifically is difficult due to the level of housing needs data available. And as this qualifying population would be considered homeless as well, this plan indicates es that of the inventory and delivery gaps reported above under “Homeless” are applicable here as well with 7% of “Homeless” gaps in inventory and delivery allocable for domestic violence victim units.
4. Other populations where providing supportive services or assis
tance would prevent a family’s homeless or serve those with greatest risk of instability
To create at least 3,000 units of deeply affordable housing opportunities over $77 million/year for rent subsidies and so supportive services for 5,000 households in deeply affordable and Supportive housing programs. Another $204 million would support capital funding to construct or rehabilitate a needed additional inventory of 750 units of either deeply affordable or permanent supportive housing units.
Further to create at least 2,000 units needed for permanent supportive housing gaps, over $1 million/year for landlord incentives, housing navigations, and move-in cost are needed.
5. Veterans and families that include a veteran family member that meets the criteria of one of four (1-4 ) above
Determining the gaps in service and delivery for this qualifying population is difficult given the level of data available. However, based on the number of unsheltered homeless veterans there is a need for at least 310 Veteran units with fund to support operations of such housing options for Veterans, who may suffer from multiple conditions including be not limited post-traumatic stress, physical disabilities and other conditions mentioned prior.
Identify the characteristics of housing associated with instability and an increased risk of homelessness if the PJ will include such conditions in its definition of “other populations” as established in the HOME-ARP Notice:
As mentioned in the Needs Assessment portion of this Plan and Application, high-cost burden is one of the housing characteristics strong linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness.
Of the 31% Oakland Renters with extremely low-income (ELI) of 30% HAMFI or lower, Oakland’s lowest income households are experiencing the highest rent burden. Over 80% of extremely low-income (ELI) households pay more than 30% of their income towards rent, with 46% paying over 50% of their income towards rent.
High rent burden on extremely low-income renters coupled along with severe housing problems is essentially a measure or proxy of a non-income household living in inhabitable conditions and considered at risk of becoming homeless. Below are highlighted characteristics of housing associated with instability and increased risk of homelessness.
Summary Level: City |
|
|
Data for: Oakland city; California |
|
Year Selected: 2014-2018 ACS |
|
Income Distribution Overview |
Owner |
Renter |
Total |
Household Income <= 30% HAMFI |
5,880 |
29,325 |
35,205 |
Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI |
5,730 |
15,550 |
21,280 |
Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI |
6,470 |
12,095 |
18,565 |
Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI |
5,420 |
8,875 |
14,295 |
Household Income >100% HAMFI |
41,675 |
30,460 |
72,135 |
Total |
65,180 |
96,305 |
161,485 |
|
|
|
|
Housing Problems Overview 1 |
Owner |
Renter |
Total |
Household has at least 1 of 4 Housing Problems |
22,690 |
51,360 |
74,050 |
Household has none of 4 Housing Problems OR cost burden not available no other problems |
42,485 |
44,945 |
87,430 |
Total |
65,180 |
96,305 |
161,485 |
|
|
|
|
Severe Housing Problems Overview 2 |
Owner |
Renter |
Total |
Household has at least 1 of 4 Severe Housing Problems |
11,925 |
32,985 |
44,910 |
Household has none of 4 Severe Housing Problems OR cost burden not available no other problems |
53,255 |
63,320 |
116,575 |
Total |
65,180 |
96,305 |
161,485 |
|
|
|
|
Housing Cost Burden Overview 3 |
Owner |
Renter |
Total |
Cost Burden <=30% |
44,060 |
49,440 |
93,500 |
Cost Burden >30% to <=50% |
11,185 |
21,290 |
32,475 |
Cost Burden >50% |
9,525 |
23,520 |
33,045 |
Cost Burden not available |
410 |
2,050 |
2,460 |
Total |
65,180 |
96,305 |
161,485 |
|
|
|
|
Income by Housing Problems (Owners and Renters) |
Household has at least 1 of 4 Housing Problems |
Household has none of 4 Housing Problems OR cost burden not available no other problems |
Total |
Household Income <= 30% HAMFI |
28,060 |
7,145 |
35,205 |
Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI |
16,785 |
4,500 |
21,280 |
Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI |
10,795 |
7,765 |
18,565 |
Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI |
6,265 |
8,030 |
14,295 |
Household Income >100% HAMFI |
12,155 |
59,985 |
72,135 |
Total |
74,050 |
87,430 |
161,485 |
|
|
|
|
Income by Housing Problems (Renters only) |
Household has at least 1 of 4 Housing Problems |
Household has none of 4 Housing Problems OR cost burden not available no other problems |
Total |
Household Income <= 30% HAMFI |
23,170 |
6,155 |
29,325 |
Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI |
12,920 |
2,630 |
15,550 |
Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI |
7,110 |
4,985 |
12,095 |
Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI |
3,590 |
5,285 |
8,875 |
Household Income >100% HAMFI |
4,575 |
25,885 |
30,460 |
Total |
51,360 |
44,945 |
96,305 |
|
|
|
|
Income by Housing Problems (Owners only) |
Household has at least 1 of 4 Housing Problems |
Household has none of 4 Housing Problems OR cost burden not available no other problems |
Total |
Household Income <= 30% HAMFI |
4,890 |
990 |
5,880 |
Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI |
3,865 |
1,870 |
5,730 |
Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI |
3,685 |
2,780 |
6,470 |
Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI |
2,675 |
2,745 |
5,420 |
Household Income >100% HAMFI |
7,580 |
34,100 |
41,675 |
Total |
22,690 |
42,485 |
65,180 |
|
|
|
|
Income by Cost Burden (Owners and Renters) |
Cost burden > 30% |
Cost burden > 50% |
Total |
Household Income <= 30% HAMFI |
27,325 |
21,510 |
35,205 |
Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI |
15,150 |
7,000 |
21,280 |
Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI |
8,930 |
2,515 |
18,565 |
Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI |
4,925 |
1,060 |
14,295 |
Household Income >100% HAMFI |
9,190 |
965 |
72,135 |
Total |
65,520 |
33,045 |
161,485 |
|
|
|
|
Income by Cost Burden (Renters only) |
Cost burden > 30% |
Cost burden > 50% |
Total |
Household Income <= 30% HAMFI |
22,555 |
17,575 |
29,325 |
Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI |
11,500 |
4,690 |
15,550 |
Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI |
5,620 |
840 |
12,095 |
Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI |
2,605 |
320 |
8,875 |
Household Income >100% HAMFI |
2,530 |
95 |
30,460 |
Total |
44,810 |
23,520 |
96,305 |
|
|
|
|
Income by Cost Burden (Owners only) |
Cost burden > 30% |
Cost burden > 50% |
Total |
Household Income <= 30% HAMFI |
4,770 |
3,935 |
5,880 |
Household Income >30% to <=50% HAMFI |
3,650 |
2,310 |
5,730 |
Household Income >50% to <=80% HAMFI |
3,310 |
1,670 |
6,470 |
Household Income >80% to <=100% HAMFI |
2,320 |
740 |
5,420 |
Household Income >100% HAMFI |
6,660 |
870 |
41,675 |
Total |
20,710 |
9,525 |
65,180 |
|
|
|
|
1. The four housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities; incomplete plumbing facilities more than 1 person per room; and cost burden greater than 30%. |
|
|
|
|
2. The four severe housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities; incomplete plumbing facilities; more than 1 person per room; and cost burden greater than 50%. |
|
|
|
|
3. Cost burden is the ratio of housing costs to household income. For renters- housing cost is gross rent (contract rent plus utilities) |
|
|
|
For owners- housing cost is "select monthly owner costs" which includes mortgage payment; utilities; association fees; insurance; and real estate taxes. |
Stable, secure, and affordable housing opportunities are critical to ensuring community health and well-being. In a report by Changing Cities Research Lab, examining areas in Oakland exhibiting residential and neighborhood instability, findings of this report
underscores the need to target strategies in Deep East Oakland and pockets of West Oakland, where code violations, unregistered rentals, rent-burdened residents, tax delinquent properties, and owners of large numbers of Oakland properties are more prevalent.
Contemporary data was examined on eviction filings, unregistered rentals, housing cost‒burdened residents, and applications for rental assistance as supplementary data to identify areas where displacement is high. Overall findings suggest:
- Eviction Filings: Eviction filings tend to occur in some places with high rates of outmigration among lower-socioeconomic-status (SES) residents, some places with high levels of financial instability in 2020, and more frequently in areas experiencing less intense levels of gentrification (Hwang et al. 2021).
- Unregistered Rentals: Unregistered rentals, however, do not overlap with eviction filings. Instead, these are more prevalent in areas that were hit hardest by the foreclosure crisis and underwent the most disinvestment during the Recession (Hwang et al. 2021).
- Housing Cost Burdened Residents: These same areas had the highest shares of residents reporting paying more than 30 percent of their income on housing. However, non-white residents were disproportionately housing cost‒burdened and were not concentrated in these areas. Although Asian and Latinx residents report being rent burdened at relatively high rates, applications for rental assistance through the Keep Oakland Housed (KOH) program suggest that these groups are severely underserved.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ebc6a5493ebe43c8bd9518e/t/609f289332d40661a1995fef/1621043351957/CCRL_ResidentialandNeighborhoodInstabilityinOakland_051421.pdf
Identify priority needs for qualifying populations:
Priority needs for all qualifying populations is to
- Raise capital funds to create 3,000 units of deeply affordable housing.
- Increase capacity to re-house 1,000 per year who recently fell into homelessness
Said priorities overlap for each of the qualifying populations listed below as follows:
PRIORITY NEEDS BY QUALIFYING POPULATION:
HOMELESS, AT RISK OF HOMELESSNESS & PART OF OTHER POPULATIONS TO PREVENT FAMILY HOMELESSNESS AND SERVE THOSE WITH GREATEST RISK OF INSTABILITY. (Qualifying Populations 1,2, and 4)
The priority needs stated above support Oakland’s Permanent Access To Housing (PATH) Plan to end homeless, with “deeply affordable housing” being the highest needed intervention to serve those who are homeless, at risk of homeless and those part of other populations where providing supportive services or assistance would prevent a family’s homelessness or serve those with greatest risk of instability.
The Oakland PATH five-year framework is based on Oakland specific data analysis and system modeling that begins the number of people homeless in Oakland in 2019. From that number the modeling estimates the number of people who could have had their homelessness prevented. And, of the remaining people, the model estimates the type and number of interventions needed to end their homelessness. Twenty percent of people could have their homelessness prevented, thirty percent of people need a Rapid Rehousing intervention to end their homelessness, thirty-five percent of people need deeply affordable housing to end their homelessness and fifteen percent need deeply affordable housing coupled with intensive services to end their homelessness
Of the four top interventions needed for the homeless and at risk of homeless, deeply affordable housing ranks at 35% and deeply affordable housing with intensive services (permanent supportive housing) at 15% for a combined 50% of needed interventions ranking at 50%.
Intervention for rapid rehousing follows behind at 30% and Prevention at 20%.
In the Summary of Strategies and Investments Needed portion of PATH, “creations of at least 3,000 units of deeply affordable housing opportunities are one of seven strategies and investments needed to address the needs of the three qualifying populations.
Oakland’s HCD Strategic Plan is in alignment these priority needs as well as the various experiences of homelessness in Oakland increased by 47% in 2019 compared to those reported in the 2017. This dramatic increase demanded a refocus on strategies, resource allocation, and timing.
In response to the updated PATH Strategy framework and the policy priorities adopted by the City, the PATH framework goals are integrated throughout HCD’s work and HCD’s Strategic Action Plan. From the seven PATH Strategy goals listed below, the HCD Strategic Plan includes homeless prevention/anti-displacement: creation of deeply affordable permanent housing, and the addressing of racial disparities.
PATH Goals:
- Prevent homelessness,
- Increase rapid returns to housing,
- Reduce the total number of people experiencing homeless,
- 4) Create deeply affordable/permanent supportive housing opportunities,
- Stabilize and increase income,
- Deliver health care and proper hygiene to encampments, and
- Address racial disparities.
Further, the data driven HCD Strategic Action Plan proposes to provide more immediate housing solutions and stability for existing tenants and unsheltered residents, focusing to investments of 50% available resources in preservation and acquisition/conversation opportunities and 50% into new construction as funding allows.
As such, implementation of this prioritization targets projects that result in immediate housing solutions, especially for Oakland’s unhoused residents, low income and extremely low income. HCD Strategic Action Plan goals take into consideration Regional Housing Needs Assessments (RHNA) targets and community driven 17k/17k goals to produce 4,760 affordable housing units by 2023.
Applying historical affordability levels onto projected production rates the City falls short of RHNA goals across all categories of affordability. To reach both 17k/17k[iii] goals and RHNA targets the City must secure new sources of capital and operating subsidy beyond $397 million to produce units needed to create housing security for all Oakland residents, particularly those with incomes at 80% AMI and below. Projected production by AMI level reflects the need for 756 affordable housing units for Oaklanders with 30% AMI and below; 949 units for Oaklanders with 31%-50% AMI; and 1,004 units for Oaklanders with 51% - 80% AMI. (See Projected Production vs. RHNA Targets chart on page 35).
VETERANS & Fleeing, or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault; stalking, or human trafficking
As part of the 2019 Oakland PIT Homeless County, PATH Strategy, HCD Strategic Plan, and other guiding Plan documents, these two populations are subpopulations of the “homeless” qualifying population. And within the priority needs framework of each of these plans these two qualifying populations account for approximately 15 % of the total homeless population of 4,071. Assessed needs are of these two qualifying populations are included in the needs
Veterans experiencing homelessness in Oakland account for 9% of Oakland’s homeless population and 52% of homeless veterans in the County of Alameda. 86% of veterans experiencing homelessness are unsheltered and 14% sheltered.
The highest of primary causes of homelessness among veterans is rent increases at (18%). Other primary causes include mental health issues, incarceration and other causes. See table on page 31.
Approximately 7% of those experiencing homeless are victims of domestic/family violence. Family/domestic violence was the most frequently reported cause of homelessness among individuals in families with children at a rate of 19% per the 2019 Homeless Count.
Explain how the level of need and gaps in its shelter and housing inventory and service delivery systems based on the data presented in the plan were determined:
The data presented in the HOME ARP plan is determined through a compilation of resources including most recent CHAS data, the 2019 PIT Homeless County, The Oakland PATH Strategy Framework Report, the Oakland Department of Housing & Community Development Strategic Plan, all of which are referenced throughout this document. In addition, needs assessment data from the City of Oakland Five Year 2020/21 - 2024/25 Consolidated Plan was utilized, all to determine the level of need and gaps in shelter, housing inventory and service delivery systems.
Each of the Plans referenced provide unique and reaffirming perspectives on existing services, inventory and gaps to be addressed to best serve each of the qualifying populations. Each Plan provided opportunity for stakeholder and public review and feedback.
HOME-ARP Activities
Describe the method for soliciting applications for funding and/or selecting developers, service providers, subrecipients and/or contractors and whether the PJ will administer eligible activities directly:
The City of Oakland, through its Affordable Housing Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) process, will solicit applications from non-profit and for-profit developers to increase housing opportunities through new construction, substantial rehabilitation and preservation of housing for extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate-income households.
The application will be made available to applicants electronically through City Data Services (CDS), enabling applicants to enter data into the electronic form and further upload into the NOFA portal. Training to support applicants completing this new form is made available via Zoom and posted on the City’s Rental Affordable Housing NOFA page of the City’s website.
Pre-bidders conferences are held at announced times and dates via Zoom. Pre bidders’ conferences are recorded and posted on the Rental Affordable Housing NOFA page of the City’s website.
Scheduled “NOFA Office Hours” are made available via Zoom for City staff to answer any application questions or concerns. All Zoom recordings mentioned in this section are then posted on the City’s Rental Affordable Housing NOFA page of the City’s website at https://www.oaklandca.gov/resources/2021-new-construction-of-multifamily-affordable-housing-nofa
Projects that apply to the NOFA will be ranked based on scoring criteria described in the NOFA as shown below. Please note that all five qualifying populations (people experiencing homelessness, at risk of being homeless, fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking or human trafficking, and families at risk of housing instability and homelessness) are prioritized through the Target Population scoring below. Under Target Population, points are awarded for projects providing units to all four qualifying populations under New Permanent Supportive Housing Units for Homeless, as well as Income Targeting for more deeply affordable units. In this way the City encourages the creation of new units to support the qualifying populations that need housing the most.
Affordable Housing NOFA Scoring Criteria |
I. |
Readiness |
43 points |
|
A. Leveraging & Readiness |
8 |
|
B. Funding Commitments |
15 |
|
C. Discretionary Land Use Approvals |
20 |
II. |
Location |
33 points |
|
A. Geographic Equity |
7 |
|
B. Educational Quality |
5 |
|
C. Neighborhood Revitalization |
6 |
|
D. Proximity to Public Transit |
5 |
|
E. Proximity to Grocery or Drug Store |
10 |
III. |
Target Population
(Weighted scores below subject to change based on target HOME ARP target population) |
38 |
|
A. New Permanent Supportive Housing Units for Homeless |
10 |
|
B. Units for people with Special Needs |
5 |
|
C. Income Targeting |
18 |
|
D. Unit Size |
5 |
IV. |
Development Experience and Capacity |
41 points |
|
A. Developer Experience Exceeds Minimum |
20 |
|
B. Developer Capacity |
8 |
|
C. Developer Financial Strength |
6 |
|
D. Strength of Development Team |
3 |
|
E. Bonus Point Category |
4 |
V. |
Sustainability |
10 |
VI. |
Penalty for Nonperforming Previously Funded Projects |
-10 |
Total Possible Points |
165 |
Once scored, staff will recommend that the City Council approve the top scoring list of projects and a total amount of funds to be awarded.
For any projects serving the qualifying populations, a Resident Services Plan must be submitted that demonstrates how essential supportive and social service needs of the qualifying populations will be provided and funded. Additional points are given to applicants that commit to using Alameda County’s Home Stretch Coordinated Entry System in their tenant selection process to fill designated permanent supportive housing and homeless units for the qualifying populations.
Further points are given to applicants with a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with a lead service provider that will deliver the services described in the Resident Services Plan. If the owner is providing direct services, then a commitment letter or board resolutions will satisfy this requirement.
If any portion of the PJ’s HOME-ARP administrative funds were provided to a subrecipients or contractor prior to HUD’s acceptance of the HOME-ARP allocation plan because the
sub-recipient or contractor is responsible for the administration of the PJ’s entire HOME-ARP grant, identify the subrecipient or contractor and describe its role and responsibilities in administering all of the PJ’s HOME-ARP program:
N/A. HOME ARP Administration funds provided to the City of Oakland are maintained to support internal administration and planning cost for the City of Oakland.
PJs must indicate the amount of HOME-ARP funding that is planned for each eligible HOME-ARP activity type and demonstrate that any planned funding for nonprofit organization operating assistance, nonprofit capacity building, and administrative costs is within HOME-ARP limits. The following table may be used to meet this requirement.
Use of HOME-ARP Funding
|
Funding Amount |
Percent of the Grant |
Statutory Limit |
Supportive Services |
$ |
|
|
Acquisition and Development of Non-Congregate Shelters |
$ |
|
|
Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) |
$ |
|
|
Development of Affordable Rental Housing |
$ 9,627,050 |
|
|
Non-Profit Operating |
$ 0 |
# % |
5% |
Non-Profit Capacity Building |
$ 0 |
# % |
5% |
Administration and Planning |
$ 1,698,891 |
15 % |
15% |
Total HOME ARP Allocation |
$ 11,325,941 |
|
|
Use of HOME ARP funding Additional narrative, if applicable:
The proposed HOME-ARP Plan - First Substantial Amendment to the FY 2021/2022 AAP establishes funding priorities for the HOME-ARP plan that targets the Development of Affordable Rental Housing for the qualifying populations through but not limited to the following activity categories:
- Acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, and operations of permanent and deeply affordable rental housing for Oakland residents experiencing homelessness and including all five
qualifying populations; and/or
- Acquisition and operations of hotels, motels, and dorms to permanently house homeless households and all five qualifying populations, including youth aging-out of the foster care system, families, and veterans; and /or
- Construction of innovative modular permanent units to house all five qualifying populations.
The City of Oakland intends to use most of these HOME-ARP funds towards production of permanent affordable rental housing, with a focus of leveraging Oakland funded Homekey and New Construction NOFA projects serving all qualifying populations with no preference. The HOME-ARP funds would provide the necessary capital match to leverage State Homekey funding and support the capital and operating costs associated with the acquisition and construction of deeply affordable permanent housing for the qualifying populations.
HOME ARP eligible uses aligns with Homekey and Oakland HCD New Construction NOFA eligible uses as follows:
ELIGIBLE USES:
HOME ARP |
Homekey |
HCD New Construction NOFA |
Production or Preservation of Affordable Housing |
Conversion of units from nonresidential to residential; acquisition, rehab of hotel/motel or other sites to be converted to permanent or interim housing; new construction of dwelling units; Purchase of affordability covenants & restrictions for units; and capitalized operating subsidies for units purchased, converted, construct or altered. |
New construction of affordable rental property, including permanent supportive housing and transitional housing, intended for occupancy by lower income households are eligible; Mixed use projects (containing both residential and non-residential space) -only the affordable housing portion of the project will be assisted |
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) |
|
|
Supportive Services, including services defined at 24 CFR 578.53(e), Homeless Prevention Services, and Housing Counseling |
Relocation cost for individuals who are being displaced |
Relocation costs; Residential Services Coordination |
Purchase and Development of Non-Congregate Shelter. |
Masterleasing of property for non-congregate housing |
|
TARGETED POPULATIONS:
HOME ARP
(Qualifying Populations) |
Homekey*
*Non target populations, in any must not exceed 49% |
HCD New Construction NOFA
(Includes HOME ARP QPs) |
Homeless |
Homeless |
Homeless |
At Risk of Homelessess |
At Risk of Homelessness (Previously homeless) |
At Risk of Homelessess (30%AMI or below) |
Fleeing, attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking |
Homeless (considered to be homeless per 42 USC 11302(b) |
Fleeing, attempting to flee domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, stalking, or human trafficking |
Other populations to prevent family homelessness or serve those with greatest risk of housing instability |
At Risk of Homelessness (per 42 USC 11360 (1)(A)(B)(C) |
Other populations to prevent family homelessness or serve those with greatest risk of housing instability |
Veterans |
Homeless (may be a subset of 11302(a)(1-5) definitions of homeless |
Veterans |
For context, “Homeless” per 42 USC 11302(a) means:
(1) an individual or family who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence;
(2) an individual or family with a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings, including a car, park, abandoned building, bus or train station, airport, or camping ground;
(3) an individual or family living in a supervised publicly or privately operated shelter designated to provide temporary living arrangements (including hotels and motels paid for by Federal, State, or local government programs for low-income individuals or by charitable organizations, congregate shelters, and transitional housing);
(4) an individual who resided in a shelter or place not meant for human habitation and who is exiting an institution where he or she temporarily resided;
(5) an individual or family who-
(A) will imminently lose their housing, including housing they own, rent, or live in without
paying rent, are sharing with others, and rooms in hotels or motels not paid for by Federal, State, or local government programs for low-income individuals or by charitable organizations, as evidenced by-
(i) a court order resulting from an eviction action that notifies the individual or family that they must leave within 14 days;
(ii) the individual or family having a primary nighttime residence that is a room in a hotel or motel and where they lack the resources necessary to reside there for more than 14 days; or
(iii) credible evidence indicating that the owner or renter of the housing will not allow the individual or family to stay for more than 14 days, and any oral statement from an individual or family seeking homeless assistance that is found to be credible shall be considered credible evidence for purposes of this clause;
(B) has no subsequent residence identified; and
(C) lacks the resources or support networks needed to obtain other permanent housing; and
(6) unaccompanied youth and homeless families with children and youth defined as homeless under other Federal statutes who-
(A) have experienced a long term period without living independently in permanent housing,
(B) have experienced persistent instability as measured by frequent moves over such period, and
(C) can be expected to continue in such status for an extended period of time because of chronic disabilities, chronic physical health or mental health conditions, substance addiction, histories of domestic violence or childhood abuse, the presence of a child or youth with a disability, or multiple barriers to employment.
Should Oakland Homekey projects not require the full allocation of HOME-ARP funds, any remaining funds could then support new construction projects that are awarded under the New Construction Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA), issued November 16, 2021, that would result in new construction of units for the qualifying populations.
The New Construction NOFA will identify affordable rental housing development projects for City funding, including deeply affordable and homeless units for the qualifying populations, which are clearly aligned with the eligible uses under the HOME-ARP program.
Specific projects to be funded will be determined through the City's 2021 Homekey applications currently under consideration by the State Housing & Community Development Department and the City of Oakland’s HCD New Construction NOFA, which is currently under review by City staff. For any remaining HOME-ARP funds, an additional round of Homekey is expected for early Fall 2022 that would provide another opportunity to support housing for the qualifying populations.
Describe how the characteristics of the shelter and housing inventory, service delivery system, and the needs identified in the gap analysis provided a rationale for the plan to fund eligible activities:
Based on the HUD Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data released September 29, 2021, for the 2014-2018 period, it reported Oakland to have a total of 161,785 owner occupied and renter occupied housing units. This is 16,984 units less than reported in the 2020 American Census Survey (ACS) Experimental Data release. Of the 161,785 total units 96,305 (60%) are recorded as rental units.
Per ACS, Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units table (S2304) for the same period of the 2014-2018 CHAS report, 30.3% of the rental housing inventory was built in or prior to 1939. 48.6% of the rental housing inventory was built between 1940 and 1979; 10.7% built between 1980 and 1999 and only 2.2% in years 2010 or later[iv].
As of 2021 approximately 30.3% of the Oakland rental housing inventory is over 82 years old; another 20.7% is between 62-81 years old and 27.9% is between 42 and 61 years old.
The 2014-2018 CHAS reports 53% (51,360) of renter-occupied units having at least one of four housing problems:
1. Incomplete kitchen facilities,
2. Incomplete plumbing facilities,
3. More than 1 person per room, and
4. Cost burden greater than 30%.
Further, the CHAS reports 34.2% (32,985) of renter-occupied units having at least 1 of 4 severe housing problems
1. Incomplete kitchen facilities,
2. Incomplete plumbing facilities,
3. More than 1 person per room, and
4. Cost burden greater than 50%.
Income by Cost Burden is reported as follows:
Income by Cost Burden (Renters only) |
Cost burden
> 30% |
Cost burden >50% |
Total |
Household Income less-than or= 30% HAMFI |
22,555 |
17,575 |
29,325 |
Household Income >30% to less-than or= 50% |
11,500 |
4,690 |
15,550 |
Household Income >50% to less-than or= 80% |
5,260 |
840 |
12,095 |
HAM Household Income >80% to less-than or= 100%
HAMFIFI |
2,605 |
320 |
8,875 |
Household Income >100% HAMFI |
2,530 |
95 |
30,460 |
TOTAL |
44,810 |
23,520 |
96,305 |
As mentioned earlier in the Plan, Oakland’s lowest income households are experiencing the highest rent burden. Over 80% of extremely low-income (ELI) households pay more than 30% of their income towards rent, with 46% paying over 50% of their income towards rent.
New affordable housing developments typically take approximately 3 - 6 years from predevelopment to occupancy. The City is applying for State Homekey program funds, requiring project completion within 12 months of the funding award, which will result in an
expedited timeline of producing designated affordable units. The HOME‐ARP funds will support Homekey project(s) and/or other Oakland HCD deeply affordable housing projects through the HCD New Construction NOFA. The actual number of units is to be determined based on the application pool. However, it is estimated that not less than 75 units of affordable housing will result from the HOME-ARP allocation. The 12-month timeline will allow the City to be more responsive to the current need for affordable housing, particularly for the most vulnerable populations.
HOME-ARP Production Housing Goals
Estimate the number of affordable rental housing units for qualifying populations that the PJ will produce or support with its HOME-ARP allocation:
Staff intends to leverage HOME ARP funds with funds to be applied for by the City in the winter of 2021 under the upcoming Homekey application process. In addition, a portion of funds included in the City’s November 2021 Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD) New Construction NOFA will be used as leverage to HOME ARP funds. Any remaining funds could be issued to support the 2022 Homekey round.
Specific projects to be funded will be determined by funds to be awarded under Homekey
Application process and HCD New Construction NOFA projects targeting qualifying populations.
Based on subsidy limit per unit for a 4-bedroom and 2-bedroom units under the HOME program as established in the HCD New Construction NOFA, it is estimated that not less than 75 units of affordable rental housing units will be produced or supported with HOME ARP funds for qualifying populations.
Describe the specific affordable rental housing production goal that the PJ hopes to achieve and describe how it will address the PJ’s priority needs:
In 2016, the Oakland Housing Cabinet released “Oakland At Home: Recommendations for Implementing A Roadmap Toward Equity from the Oakland Housing Cabinet. The Housing Cabinet set an ambitious target of 17,000 units (17k/17k plan) to be produced in the City from 2016 through 2023, with 4,760 of those units to be affordable. When compared to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) production goals for 2015 to 2023, the 17k/17k plan exceeds the RHNA production goals of units for households earning no more than 80% AMI.
To meet the 17k/17k affordable unit production target, the City needs to produce an average of 595 units per year. However, in order to make up the deficit from past years’ production, this annual target must increase to 927 units per year to reach 4,760 total affordable units by 2023.
City of Oakland’s priority needs of increased affordable housing and housing for the homeless are met with the challenge of identifying an additional subsidy $307,032,000 ($307M) for FYs 2021/22 - 2023/24 to fill this gap of an additional 2,781 affordable housing units by 2023, to reach the goal of 4,760 total affordable housing units produced from 2016 - 2023.
HOME ARP funds, one-time funds as part of that $307M subsidy of affordable housing dollars will be used leverage, Housing Trust Funds, Boomerang Funds, HOME, Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Fund (LMIHAF), loan repayments, and other anticipated one-time funds: Measure KK, HOME ARP funds (included in this plan), and Homekey funds to be applied for.
In order to provide more immediate housing solutions and stability for existing tenants and unsheltered/homeless residents, the City commits to shifting its two-year focus to invest 50% of its available resources in the preservation and acquisition/conversion opportunities and 50% into new construction as funding allows. Implementation of this prioritization over the next two years will target projects that result in immediate housing solutions, especially for the residents of Oakland experiencing homelessness.
HOME ARP funds will serve as a vital source in the priority of increasing affordable rental housing for those the homeless, those at risk of homeless, fleeing domestic violence, and others at risk of housing instability. The City has partnered with the County Continuum of Care to set-aside homeless units for referrals through the County Coordinated Entry System (CES). CES prioritizes referrals at a regional level to address the highest needs of people experiencing homelessness, which include all qualifying populations.
Further HOME ARP funds will support the City’s framework of Preservation, Protection, and Production. Using the framework of Preservation, Protection and Production to focus on the highest priorities of addressing homelessness, housing for extremely low income (ELI) households, deep racial inequities, displacement, and impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic, HCD will employ these strategies to address affordable housing/homeless needs.
Preferences
Identify whether the PJ intends to give preference to one or more qualifying populations or a subpopulation within one or more qualifying populations for any eligible activity or project:
- Preferences cannot violate any applicable fair housing, civil rights, and nondiscrimination requirements, including but not limited to those requirements listed in 24 CFR 5.105(a).
- PJs are not required to describe specific projects to which the preferences will apply.
If a preference was identified, explain how the use of a preference or method of prioritization will address the unmet need or gap in benefits and services received by individuals and families in the qualifying population or category of qualifying population, consistent with the PJ’s needs assessment and gap analysis:
Not applicable. The City does not intend to give preference; the HOME-ARP funds will be used to create more deeply affordable and permanent supportive housing for the qualifying populations. Upon implementation, Oakland HOME ARP will support all qualifying populations chronologically through a coordinated entry system, with no preference.
If in the future the City finds it necessary to identify a preference of qualifying population(s), the City will take the appropriate actions to amend the HOME ARP Plan for HUD review and
approval.
If a preference was identified, describe how the PJ will use HOME-ARP funds to address the unmet needs or gaps in benefits and services of the other qualifying populations that are not included in the preference:
Not applicable. The City is not identifying a preference; the HOME-ARP funds will be used to create more deeply affordable and permanent supportive housing for the qualifying populations. Upon implementation, Oakland HOME ARP will support all qualifying populations.
HOME-ARP Refinancing Guidelines
If the PJ intends to use HOME-ARP funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily rental housing that is being rehabilitated with HOME-ARP funds, the PJ must state its HOME-ARP refinancing guidelines in accordance with 24 CFR 92.206(b). The guidelines must describe the conditions under with the PJ will refinance existing debt for a HOME-ARP rental project, including:
- Establish a minimum level of rehabilitation per unit or a required ratio between rehabilitation and refinancing to demonstrate that rehabilitation of HOME-ARP rental housing is the primary eligible activity
Not applicable.
- Require a review of management practices to demonstrate that disinvestment in the property has not occurred; that the long-term needs of the project can be met; and that the feasibility of serving qualified populations for the minimum compliance period can be demonstrated.
Not applicable.
- State whether the new investment is being made to maintain current affordable units, create additional affordable units, or both.
Not applicable.
- Specify the required compliance period, whether it is the minimum 15 years or longer.
Not applicable.
- State that HOME-ARP funds cannot be used to refinance multifamily loans made or insured by any federal program, including CDBG.
Not applicable.
- Other requirements in the PJ’s guidelines, if applicable:
Not applicable.
END OF HOME ARP PLAN APPLICATION
.
AMENDED ANNUAL ACTION PLAN SECTIONS
Expected Resources
AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2)
Introduction
Under the HUD CPD 2021 (Oakland FY 2021/22) Formula Grant allocations, the City of Oakland is allocated $14,654,409 in CDBG, HOME, HOPWA and ESG funds as listed below:
2021 FEDERAL ENTITLEMENT FORMULA GRANTS AWARDED TO THE CITY
PROGRAM |
2021-2022 HUD/CPD ALLOCATION |
CDBG |
$7,704,236 |
HOME |
$3,173,248 |
ESG |
$660,016 |
HOPWA |
$3,078,240 |
HOME-ARP (American Recovery Plan) Act |
$11,325,941 |
TOTAL |
$25,941,681 |
AP-38 Project Summary
HOME ARP 1 |
Project Title |
Oakland HOME-ARP - Grantee Admin. |
Description |
HOME ARP Grantee Admin and Planning |
Grantee/Project ID |
Oakland/Oracle Project # TBD |
Estimate Amount |
HOME-ARP $11,325,941 (Total Grant)
$1,698,891.15 (Grantee Admin) |
Annual Goals Supported |
Production |
Priority Needs Addressed |
Affordable Housing |
Target Date for Completion |
06/30/2030 |
Estimate the number & type of families that will benefit from proposed activities: |
Not less than 79 homeless or chronically homeless |
Location Description |
Oakland, CA |
Target Areas Included |
East Oakland, West Oakland, Citywide |
Planned Activities |
Use Home-ARP funds as leverage to State Homekey funding and Oakland HCD New Construction NOFA to support the capital costs associated with the acquisition and construction of deeply affordable permanent housing units to serve people experiencing homelessness or at risk of becoming homeless. Subsets of two population include all qualified populations. Qualified Development Sponsor Teams under the NOFAs include agencies serving veterans, victims of domestic violence or trafficking, homeless, those at risk of homelessness, and other populations in need of services to prevent family homelessness or housing instability. Any remaining funds may be used to support new construction projects that are awarded under the 2021-22 New Construction NOFA, issued November 16, 2021. The New Construction NOFA will identify affordable rental housing development projects for City funding, including deeply affordable and homeless units, which are clearly aligned with the eligible uses under the HOME-ARP program.
Specific projects to be funded are to be determined through the upcoming Homekey application to be submitted by the City and the November 2021 HCD New Construction NOFA. |
HOME ARP 2 |
Project Title |
Oakland HOME-ARP - Affordable Housing Development |
Description |
Acquisition, construction, rehabilitation and operations of deeply affordable housing for Oakland Qualifying Populations |
Grantee/Project ID |
Oakland/Oracle Project # TBD |
Estimate Amount |
HOME-ARP $11,325,941 (Total Grant)
Up to $9,627,049.85 |
Annual Goals Supported |
Production |
Priority Needs Addressed |
Affordable Housing |
Target Date for Completion |
06/30/2030 |
Estimate the number & type of families that will benefit from proposed activities: |
To Be Determined |
Location Description |
Oakland, CA |
Target Areas Included |
East Oakland, West Oakland, Citywide |
Planned Activities |
Use Home-ARP funds as leverage to a combination of State Homekey & Oakland HCD New Construction NOFA funding and support the capital costs associated with the acquisition, rehabilitation and construction of deeply affordable permanent housing units for all qualifying populations.
Acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, and operations of permanent and deeply affordable rental housing for Oakland residents experiencing homelessness and including all four qualifying populations; and/or
Acquisition and operations of hotels, motels, and dorms to permanently house homeless households and all four qualifying populations, including youth aging-out of the foster care system, families, and veterans; and /or
Construction of innovative modular permanent units to house all qualifying populations.
Specific projects to be funded are to be determined through the upcoming Homekey application to be submitted as part of the HCD New Construction NOFA. |
[i]
https://safehousingpartnerships.org/sites/default/files/2017-05/SHP-Homelessness%20and%20DV%20Inforgraphic_1.pdf
[ii] 2021 – 2023 Oakland Housing & Community Development 2021-2023 Strategic Action Plan - https://cao-94612.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/HCD.final.21-21Strategic-Plan.pdf
[iii] The Housing Cabinet set an ambitious target of 17,000 units to be produced in the City from 2016 through 2023, with 4,760 of those units to be affordable. When compared to RHNA production goals for 2015 to 2023, the 17k/17k plan exceeds the RHNA production goals of units for households earning no more than 80% AMI. To meet the 17k/17k affordable unit production target, the City needs to produce an average of 595 units per year. However, in order to make up the deficit from past years’ production, this annual target must increase to 927 units per year to reach 4,760 total affordable units by 2023.
[iv] Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units table (S2304)
https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=housing&g=1600000US0653000&y=2019&tid=ACSST1Y2019.S2504